Simon Griffiths Blog

My thoughts on …. everything

Archive for June, 2008

Flashy sites annoy users

without comments

SDL Tridion have just announced the results of a survey to see what annoys website users. No surprises here: -

  • Pop-up windows
  • Long intros you can’t get out of
  • Losing your info
  • Downloading new applications (what, their IT departments let them!)
  • Asking for personal info

No surprises here, but a good reminder.

Written by Simon

June 29th, 2008 at 5:54 pm

Posted in marketing,Web development

Tagged with , ,

Animoto Update

without comments

For all of you who have been producing video in Animoto, they have just announced a commercial/business license for $249. A bargain I think! See http://business.animoto.com/learnmore.html for details.

Essentially though you get as many DVD quality videos as you want, you can resell if you are in that business, and branding is reduced to a small powered by Animoto.

Written by Simon

June 27th, 2008 at 7:31 pm

Why Yahoo was right to hold out (and Google has it wrong)

without comments

In the last few weeks there has been many articles about Yahoo, that they are unfocused, and should have sold to Microsoft, but in one area they are the leaders and are killing Google. Don’t get me wrong here, I love Googles stuff in general but on the mobile phone, they suck!

First let me explain why this is a big deal. There is a growing tendency for people to access the web via their mobile and all the big players in the search market want a slice of the action. Why is this of interest to them? Simply because of the numbers involved. There are about 850 million PC’s out there at the moment where search engines can make their money, but 2.7 billion mobile phones. That is more than 3 times the number of phones than PC’s.

Think about it in terms of market share, at the moment Google has 60% of the PC market say, but if you add mobiles into the mix, that would be just a 14% share of the total available market. If someone moves into that mobile space, Google could be sidelined!

Okay, so having said that, where are they going to make their money? Ads are the obvious answer, and to a large extent an ad served to a mobile is even more compelling than those served on a PC search. The advantage of mobile is that they know where you are, so can send you ads that may not relate to the search, but more to your location? Maybe you can resist that coffee now, but could you if you were given 20% discount from the place you are just passing?

So what do Yahoo do so write that Google do wrong? They look at intent rather than just content.

If you do a search on Google mobile, you will be returned almost exactly the same results as you will be on their desktop browser. If you look at Yahoo though you get their top 3 normal web links, and their top 3 mobile web links. You can chose to navigate to more normal or more mobile links from there.

At this point you can see there is a fundamental difference between the two approaches. My guess is that Google is expecting that you would use an iPhone or similar which has full browsing capabilities, however this is missing the point. If you are out on the road somewhere, navigating with one hand you need content and design to suit that requirement.

As an example I live in Brisbane Australia and often travel into the city by train. If I search on Google for Brisbane Train Times using my Sony K800i, or my iPod Touch I get a list of full websites that often to be honest don’t give me what I want, train times quickly and in a form factor convenient form. However go to Yahoo and do the same and you get the local council version, and a mobile specific train times program, which gives me just what I want. This shows that Yahoo is looking at the intent of mobile browsing, and is inherently more usable.

On the iPod Touch I can obviously navigate full website with not too much effort, but the different is still astonishing. Try looking at http://www.qr.com.au and http://www.tad.tw and you can see for yourself.

The end result is that on my mobile I use Yahoo, and on my Mac I use Google. If this were to replicate through the mobile space with the positions of Yahoo and Google reversed on the different platforms, where would things sit? Google would end up with 29.6% of the market, and Yahoo with 50.4%*. Even if only half of the people used the mobile web Yahoo would still overtake Google in the total search market.

In short, Yahoo was right to hold off on Microsoft. If they can maintain their focus on the mobile market, in 2 or 3 years we could all be buying their stock.

* Figures are based on 60% of the 850 million PC using Google, and 20% using Yahoo. One the mobile 60% using Yahoo and 20% using Google.

Written by Simon

June 26th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

Web Enquiry System Optimisation

without comments

Over the last few months I have been testing a web enquiry system to see if it can be improved. At the moment the system is a simple page that opens in a new window that you have to complete with contact details and what you want.

After testing some relatively simple changes you can see huge improvement in the completion rate of the form and the visit to enquiry ratio for the page.

I thought I would post this as a way to illustrate that it content is king, usability is president. A few simple changes can generate a huge increase in revenue!

The report can be found in Google Docs form here.

Written by Simon

June 24th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

The future of the data centre

without comments

I thought you might be interested in a presentation I did on the future of data centers, and how I see developments in power and cooling.

This was presented to the company I work for so is rather vague on detail!

Go to here to see the presentation or see below.

Written by Simon

June 24th, 2008 at 4:07 pm

Founder of Delicious to go

without comments

There are some reports that Josh Schachter, the founder of delicious will be leaving Yahoo too. I have to say that I am a big fan of delicious and its ability to tag links, which the browsers are only just catching up with. For me this makes it much easier to find things that I bookmark because I think I might have a use for them in the future.

Personally however I feel that the big problem is that delicious has a huge userbase, and outgoings to match, and very little ways to bring money in. When I look at how I use it, I very rarely go to their website even, using buttons in my browser to tag links and access my links. Even when I do go to their site, there is no ads, no premium services, nothing that can bring in money.

When I look at the info in my delicious bookmarks though, you can find out a lot about me and my interests. Surely if delicious had been bought by Google they would have taken advantage of that by at least serving ads that are likely to match my interests when I visit my home page, or specific ads when I click on a tag.

As a user of delicious I have to say that I really wouldn’t mind them making a bit of money, as lets face it, if I want to keep these links into the future, they need to be at least recovering their costs.

Written by Simon

June 22nd, 2008 at 4:18 pm

Animoto update

without comments

Animoto have just updated their app to allow you to download a high RES mpeg4 and ISO (DVD) file. It costs $5 but is well worth it.

Resolution is doubled so will play well on a monitor and even scales to plasma or LCD screens.

We are using it to produce slick video which we play on digital photo frames in our office reception areas.

Only grumble is they still add the animoto logo and google checkout or paypal accounts are difficult in corporate environments.

Written by Simon

June 17th, 2008 at 5:33 am

Posted in marketing,Web development

Tagged with ,

Cool Videos Quickly

without comments

Discovered Animoto a while back for creating quick, cool video for presentations, the web etc.

This is a really great tool. All you need to do is upload photos, or select them directly from your flickr account, select some music, or upload your own, and it does the rest.

The amazing bit is that this is a TV like production. None of those static images or simple Ken Burns effects, this produces something that would look the part on the TV!

Have a look at the below for an example.

B&R Enclosures

Written by Simon

June 4th, 2008 at 4:44 pm